The European Commission has estimated that the coming AI Act will impact roughly 5-15% of all AI systems deployed in Europe. As the regulation is coming close to its final approval, it's time to ask: Who are the ones impacted?

Digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly transforming medicine, medical research, and public health. AI is now used in health services around the world. The use of AI for health nevertheless raises new ethical, legal, and societal concerns.

While third-party AI-based products become a new source of risk for recruiters, procurement establishes itself as the most critical process where the AI alignment with ethical principles and regulations is operationalized in HR. As the first step, recruiters should demand greater transparency from their HR AI technology providers.

The EU’s proposed regulation has already inspired some international regulative proposals and is likely to broadly impact AI policies around the world. Yet the Act is still in process, it’s strengths could be compromised, or it’s weaknesses addressed. In this piece, we analyze the core policy concepts of the AI Act, with focus both on those worth amending and defending.

Providing transparency to your product deployers, operators and users can seem like an overwhelming task, particularly when done without the right set of tools. Saidot is happy to introduce its newest addition of policy templates for efficient AI governance and transparency: the Instructions of Use.

Data protection and privacy are often mentioned in the same sentence, however, there is an important distinction between the two concepts: data protection refers to tools and policies restricting access to personal data against unauthorized access, whereas privacy defines who in the organizations or entities has authorized access to the personal data.